Maximus Jones vs Matteo Covato Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Jones vs M. Covato

THA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Jones 1 - 0 Covato
They have played 2 sets in total, with Maximus Jones winning 2 and Matteo Covato winning 0. The last match between Maximus Jones and Matteo Covato was at the Brazzaville Challenger, 17-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Maximus Jones getting the victory 6-1 7-5.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Jones | 1 |
Covato | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Brazzaville Challenger(02-17-25)
M. Jones vs M. Covato H2H Profile
M. Jones vs M. Covato Match Preview:
Prediction Insights: The recent performance of Covato and Jones holds significant implications for the upcoming tennis match. Analyzing their statistics presents valuable information for forecasters.
Notable Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Covato has triumphed in 45.99% of points on their second serve, whereas Jones has achieved a higher success rate of 53.07%. It is worth noting the strong correlation between this statistical aspect and the accuracy of match predictions.
Return Game Statistics: Examining the return game statistics of Covato and Jones in recent form unveils intriguing insights. Covato has conquered 49.12% of their opponent's second serve points, and Jones, slightly surpassing them, has secured 49.46%. In terms of first serve returns, Covato holds a success rate of 32.94%, while Jones slightly trails at 31.82%. These numbers showcase a considerable correlation in determining the favored player in this highly anticipated head-to-head matchup.
Under Pressure Analysis: During pivotal moments, Covato has effectively saved 50.45% of breakpoints in recent matches. Conversely, Jones has displayed an impressive ability to salvage 64.48% of breakpoints, making this statistic invaluable for in-game betting predictions.
Performance Overview: Over the past year, Covato has emerged victorious in 48.72% of matches played, boasting a win/loss record of 19/20. In contrast, Jones has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 45.65% with a win/loss record of 21/25. Considering these matchups collectively provides a comprehensive overview for predicting the outcome.
Surface Specialization: Covato exhibits their greatest career surface win percentage on Clay, triumphing in 52% of matches (W/L 12/11). Contrarily, their performance on Hard courts falters, with a win percentage of only 32% (W/L 11/23). On the other hand, Jones excels on Hard courts, conquering 51% of matches (W/L 87/83), while their performance on Clay surfaces proves to be less formidable, with a win percentage of 37% (W/L 11/19).
Player Level: Over the past year, Covato has predominantly competed in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a $10K prize scale. Impressively, they have emerged victorious in 47.22% of matches (W/L 17/19). Comparatively, Jones has encountered similar circumstances, participating in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a similar prize valuation, where they have secured triumphs in 43.59% of matches (W/L 17/22). Assessing the stats relative to the event level at which they have competed is crucial in predicting the favored player.
Opponent Quality Statistics: Covato faced opponents with an average rank of 74.05 over the past 12 months, whereas Jones' competitors held an average rank of 341.89. These rankings shed light on the caliber of opponents faced by each player.
Deciding Set Performance: For those interested in live predictions and betting, evaluating the players' performance in deciding sets is imperative. Over the last year, Covato has emerged triumphant in 56% of deciding sets, while Jones has secured victories in 41% of all matches played on tour.
Current Event H2H Statistics: Considering past player performances is indeed valuable in predicting tennis matches. However, once an event commences, it becomes imperative to evaluate current event statistics to gauge the form of each player. For further details, please refer to the section below (if available). Additionally, certain players may demonstrate superior performances at specific events, and this aspect should be factored into outcome predictions.
Break Point Conversion: Evaluating recent form, Covato has efficiently converted 46.67% of breakpoint opportunities, whereas Jones has secured successful conversions in 39.8% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This statistic holds significant weight when engaging in in-game live betting and identifying favorable moments during breakpoint opportunities.
If you seek models that successfully predict tennis matches, this article is an excellent starting point. However, please note that it caters to statistics enthusiasts exclusively.
Maximus Jones vs Matteo Covato Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Jones vs M. Covato H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 6 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
1:19:41 | Average Match Time | 1:19:41 |
66% (33/50) | 1st Serve % | 72% (43/60) |
82% (27/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (21/43) |
65% (11/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (10/17) |
50% (4/8) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
48% (29/60) | Return Points Win % | 24% (12/50) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Jones Recent Matches Played
M. Covato Recent Matches Played

M. Jones vs M. Covato Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
50.99% (129/124) | YTD Win/Loss | 36.56% (34/59) |
50.61% (292/285) | Sets Win/Loss | 38.28% (80/129) |
50.23% (2778/2753) | Games Win/Loss | 45.63% (930/1108) |
53.00% (106/94) | Hard Win/Loss | 28.26% (13/33) |
43.14% (22/29) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.67% (21/24) |
50.00% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.35 |
702 | Aces Total | 350 |
0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
497 | Total Double Faults | 288 |
1:26:36 | Average Match Time | 1:10:39 |
391.14 | Average Opponent Rank | 218.26 |
63% (8904/14219) | 1st Serve % | 64% (2783/4378) |
68% (6041/8904) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (1920/2783) |
50% (2656/5315) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (706/1595) |
43% (496/1158) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (127/343) |
38% (5143/13702) | Return Points Win % | 35% (1517/4325) |
50.00% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
55.74% (34/27) | Challenger W/L | 27.27% (3/8) |
49.47% (94/96) | Futures W/L | 37.80% (31/51) |
51% (127/248) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 37% (34/92) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
51% (41/80) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (12/25) |
53% (39/74) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (12/23) |
85% (127/108) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (36/30) |
15% (127/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (36/5) |
16% (126/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 7% (57/4) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
